When AI Gives You Health Advice: Is the advice reliable? A Helpful Tool or Hidden Risk?
More people than ever are turning to AI tools for health advice — from interpreting symptoms to exploring supplement options. While AI chatbots can be a helpful starting point, they cannot assess your individual health history, medications, or test results. So where does AI end and professional guidance begin? This article explores the benefits of AI in health, and why personalised decisions still need a human expert behind them.
2 responses
Hi,
That would be because the science does not back up the existence of NCGS, in fact FODMOPS are looking more and more likely they culprit, not gluten.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24026574 and http://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(13)00702-6/fulltext
with a properly controlled people with self-reported NCGS responded in the same manner to GF and none GF diets. I was exceptionally happy with the GI specialist they used, he was very firm in differentiation supposed gluten intolerance from clinically relevant coeliac.
I blame the gluten free marketing machine.
Dear Heva?
Thank you for your answer. The conmplexities of gluten and or fodmap and other reasons a person reacts to a food are vast and very complicated and the underlying driver also needs to be considered. I agree that in some cases it is a FODMAP issue but the work of Tom O’Bryan around gluten and Aleso Fassano re Intestinal permeability show some of these complexities…. have you come across their work before?